Ramachandra Guha is a Man of Impeccable Integrity. Wait and Watch.

Some people are getting swayed by the following blog post written by that obscure Belgian ex-priest, Koenraad Elst:

“Guha Must Apologize for Lying”!!!

Pompously titling his piffle as “Guha vs Elst”, as if he is the equal of that intellectual giant, Ramachandra Guha, Elst levels a series of base and vulgar allegations at the door of the celebrated Padma Bhushan awardee. The most serious of these allegations is the startling claim that Guha wrote about him in, of all places, the pro-Communist journal The Hindu.

Two points are worth bearing in mind when pondering over these dubious and mischievous claims.

Point #1. Who is Guha and who is Elst? Guha is a widely known historian. He is a regular on Rajdeep Sardesai’s CNN-IBN channel (where Sagarika Ghose is also a regular, but that is beside the point). The Congress-led government of India honored him with a Padma Bhushan. His name appears in newspapers not only as a byline but also in news. Elst, on the other hand, is an obscure Belgian ex-priest, who (so the rumor goes) was fired from the priesthood of Antwerp’s Sidhi Vinayaka temple for barring European untouchables from entering the temple. In other words, a failed Hindu fundamentalist. Why on earth would Guha write about Elst?

Point #2. And then the canard that Guha wrote about Elst in The Hindu, whose editor is the founder of CPIM’s student body, and also goes on chaperoned trips to Tibet to declare it a socialist paradise on earth. The insinuation that Guha would associate himself with such a fanatical Marxist publication is beneath contempt. Let us make this clear: Guha is not a leftwinger. He counts among his friends IT czars and corporate honchos. He is an Independent. The best proof of his independence is available in the statement he issued right after he was awarded Padma Bhushan, in which he said something to the effect that the award honors not himself but the tradition of Objective History-Writing in India. With that statement, he silenced nasty critics who insinuated that he got the award for writing stuff that the Establishment would approve. Why then would such a man publish anything about a non-entity of an ex-priest in an “ideological document”, as was The Hindu called by its prolific letters-to-the-editor writers?

If you are not still convinced about Guha’s independence, consider this other piece of evidence. He labeled Arundhati Roy the “Arun Shourie of the Left”. This left Roy’s fans fuming, for they considered it blasphemy that a liberal like herself should be compared to a hidebound conservative like Shourie. Shourie’s admirers, on the other hand, wondered if the grey matter in Guha’s head was in short supply, for, they contended, how could he compare a man who argues on the basis of reason and evidence to a lady who swims and floats in a sea of rhetoric. If you can anger both the Left and the Right, surely, you are an Independent?

To add insult to injury, the ex-priest calls the independent intellectual a liar.

Like many other Indian intellectuals, Guha is man of impeccable integrity. He is not going to take being called a liar lying down. He believes in the power of ideas, not in the power of his media pals to help him tide over embarrassment. He is not going to take refuge in his CNN-IBN celebrity-hood. He is not going to pretend that a Padma Bhushan-ee like himself need not respond to an obscure ex-priest.

Watch out folks, Guha is going to answer Elst. He will either apologize, or prove Elst wrong. All you laughing rightwingers will have egg on your face.


About auldtimer

Check me out on Twitter @auldtimer
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Ramachandra Guha is a Man of Impeccable Integrity. Wait and Watch.

  1. Dirt Digger says:

    Smart points there. Guha is one of the worst historians spouting ignorant viewpoints without any analysis or facts. Do post his apology if you happen to come across one :)

  2. Anonymous says:

    Good you wrote it is a rumour that Elst was an ex-preist and this is “real” news that he was the fired as preist of a Ganesh temple in Antwerp. Guha said that Elst was an ex-priest ( church ), which Elst has flatly denied. It is really funny that Elst has to alternate between the church and Ganesh temple. Phew !!! What responsiblities Elst has to shoulder. How can Elst be a failed Hindu fundamentalist ? He must be the most versatile secular priest who could do two faiths as proposed by Guha and this write up.

  3. Koenraad Elst says:

    To whom it may concern: I have never heard of a Sidhi Vinayak temple in Antwerp, much less served as a priest there. Nor have I ever practised any discrimination against “untouchables”. Indeed, per “Hindu fundamentalist” definition, I am an untouchable myself. When I interviewed the Puri Shankaracharya, he did not allow me to approach him any closer than 5 m and refused to talk to me directly, instead addressing the Brahmin friend who had introduced me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s